Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Backdoor Santa, Crooked and Wide
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Shasta Angels
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Last Thursday in Portland - Mini-tour Part1
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Before the doors opened: On The Boards NWNW Festival 2010
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Softly Now @ the Rendezvous
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Duke grad on the top 40 charts
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Bob Dylan to play Bumbershoot
Monday, May 24, 2010
Catherine Cabeen @ Seattle Changing Room
It’s a strange thing to blog about a different kind of Farfetcher endeavor. But here I go…
May 21st through 23rd Catherine Cabeen put on a dance concert at the Seattle Changing Room. It was a great success, selling out every night, and last night (Sunday) there was a standing ovation that Catherine could not stop even as she tried to get attention to thank the audience and announce the post show q&a session. I was lucky enough to be involved not only for technical support – I also composed the music for the third piece performed “Composites.”
My good friend Jay McAleer, who used to work at On The Boards theatre with me as the technical director and master electrician was responsible for getting this project started, and for including me. I was honored to be asked; we had talked about working on a project together, but it was still a surprise to actually get down to doing it for real.
Jay approached Catherine about creating a piece, using a text he wrote. The intention was to sidestep the ways that text has been used before in dance, by avoiding literal references, and instead focusing on the syntax and rhythm of the words. Catherine took this perhaps too literally (haha) and began devising a phonetic movement vocabulary, with the intention of actually translating the words into a new language, word by word, even syllable by syllable! This turned out to be an amazing way to create dance abstracted from the meaning of the words, but still directly related to the text. At the same time though, it proved to be a very slow and difficult way to choreograph a piece. The 1st, 5th, and 12th (last) sections used this method, but in the other sections Catherine returned to a less prolix method.
Jay and Catherine met once a week for rehearsals, in which he would read his words aloud as she worked through the movement she developed in her own practice earlier in the week. Jay and I also met up a few times and talked through the kind of music that would work, and in the spirit of not recreating the ways we had seen text used before, I suggested recording him reading, but then running his voice through synthesizers and processing to obscure the actual text while retaining the musical delivery of the words, the timing, and the rhythm. After our recording session I put together a first draft basically using every trick I had in the bag. We all met up at one of the Saturday afternoon sessions, and listened and discussed, eliminating some of the (ahem) bad ideas, and choosing the cooler stuff.
Back to the Farfetcher basement. The first section of the text refers to the “fife and drum” and to the fiddle, and here I was semi-literal myself! I pulled up samples of actually flute, African drums, and a pizzicato violin section.
In this vein I also dug into the sound effects library for these quotes:
Some sailing sounds - “If you must know, I was thinking of myself as sailed into Athens”
A train whistle - “During the 1870s, railroad companies in the United States maintained 50 different time zones”
Some rain – “All day long with the rain on the window, and the cracked teacup by the phone”
Jay meanwhile was adamantly stopping Catherine from being too literal in the dance, and he stayed the course with me too, reminding me to abstract more, to go for the moods, meter and feel of the text. I was being too…anti-metaphorical. Overall, the words we decided captured the overall vibe of the text were “the thick residue of experience,” and so everything got a bit darker. (I know I keep quoting from a text you don’t have – but you will have to buy the chapbook from Catherine’s site to get it, at least until Jay publishes it in another form.)
We added a typewriter sound (recorded with the laptop off and me beating away on the keyboard) and I reprised that sound later by playing snare drum samples on my midi keyboard as if I was typing. I used the flute to indicate the spaces between sentences for Catherine to cue off, since she was dancing to Jay reading, and now we were erasing huge sections of text from the mix. A few musical themes emerged, the characteristic flute punctuation, a pizzicato violin part, and a syncopated finger-picking pattern on my trusty Les Paul Special. I don’t know why, but the music turned up all basically in E though it drifts between major and minor. Catherine loved a rhythmic gated effect from the trial draft, but we moved it to a different section and I “technofied” it with an electronica snare roll and a dance style syncopated bass line.
My favorite cool trick may have been putting a gate on a wind sound, and then using Jay’s voice as a side chain, so that it came in only when he was speaking. I had a lot of fun with panning, delays and a truly massive reverb on the guitar. The “bro” turned up for the penultimate section (dobro I mean) – it’s a Gold Tone, tuned in bluegrass open G if you were wondering J
In the final section, Catherine spoke part of the text aloud in the room, which was then repeated by the recorded Jay. Remembering this sonic moment and its 3 dimensional performance reminds me that the piece is really all the parts, you have to see the dance, hear the text, and hear the music to really connect to this. Perhaps the video will be a viable approximation, and I promise to alert you when it turns up, until then – hopefully this tunepak (below) will work (or you can go to my reverb nation profile here). I had to break up the music into sections because of space limitations - anybody with a good free podcasting host please comment! Actually – all comments welcome, no-one has reviewed the show yet, so be critical and say what you feel. (I will delete spam and useless profanity though)
Thanks to Catherine and Jay for being incredibly fun to collaborate with! Thanks to Scott, Jay, BC, Tom & Joy, Rich and especially to my lady Anne for getting me through my art music debut!
The music is here: http://www.reverbnation.com/tunepak/2671983
Other links :
http://www.catherinecabeen.com/dancer.html
http://o.seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/thearts/2011913599_cabeen21.html
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Lingo: the controversy continues!
After having a conversation with KT Niehoff and also reading Jeremy M. Barker's thoughtful article on Sunbreak, I realize that my own take on "Glimmer" wasn't much on substance. I think that's alright though, its a young blog yet!
The article is here
This is what I'm posting in the comments :
"Does the dance community deserve better from its reviewers?
I was intrigued by your (Jeremy's) quote from Joan Acocella, the idea that space in the paper is really determined by the "is there any news here?' question. Clearly a lot has changed in 18 years!
Wonderfully, in this case the "news" has been KT herself putting her opinion out there. Admittedly she has had to survive a certain amount of abuse, (where do you buy a thick skin in Seattle?), and it might be difficult to convince her or any other choreographer to speak out because of it, but I loved that she did speak, and that the Stranger printed it. Even the more mean spirited comments are to me an indication that people have an opinion. The dance audience has a reaction to something they read! About dance!
Back to the old idea of space: A print reviewer must build authority, gain some kind of respect, answering "what is this show?" in order to succeed in building an audience and keeping some space to write in. The critic (really this is likely to be the same person eh?) perhaps was trying to place art in a context and thus assign value "Was it any good and why not?"
The flip style of the Stranger (is "quip" the new "flip?") is I think, derived from blogs and emails, the competition that is driving print media out of business. The value of the blog is measured not in space, but in views, hits, and visits. The audience is as varied as the writers; the only required motivation is interest in a topic. The writing is casual, low on Expertise and Authority, high on impressions and thoughts. This kind of writing does not require the same level of education and knowledge about the work that say, a dancer has, or an art historian. Point is - going out and seeing the show has a similar lack of requirements.
Does the dance community deserve better from its reviewers? I say "No." My own review was ignorant, impressionistic and dismissive too. I hear and acknowledge however, that perhaps a reviewer who takes the space, discloses intention and perspective, and does the work of becoming more qualified to speak about the art, will both elevate the discussion and find an audience that craves that."
Note - I am not saying a blog can't be educated and knowledgable :) Still, I wonder what you think...
